The Global Millennium Scam Bug Essays

The Global Millennium Scam Bug Essays The Global Millennium Scam Bug Paper The Global Millennium Scam Bug Paper As the world prepares for the Y2K supposed disaster of global communications, health care malfunctions, and various transport system glitches, one can only be a little skeptical of the whole situation presented by our government and ones abroad. Although from the information presented by the media and other sources, that the world will face a global recession, many people including myself agree that this hyped up computer glitch is more than it appears to be. Although many people assessing the millennium bug to try eliminating its furry upon networks; it seems that this whole situation in my opinion is well thought out scam from the beginning of computer development in the 50s. Governments covering up information, public being shown only a piece of the truth; we have seen it all before starting with Watergate and even being presented by the president abroad in 1999. The Y2K problem is more than it seems to be, and in my opinion it might even be a scam! Computer sales will sky rocket and supermarkets will start seeing people loading up on food because they fear the unexpected- the global recession that every business is afraid of. If the problem is not cleared up in peoples mind than their psychological outlook on this situation will in fact end with mass quantities of people going nuts. (Ackerman, March 13, 1998). The Y2K problem was never the actual act of fixing the code, it was the inaction and denial regarding a problem so easily demonstrated us real and pressing, and possessing consequences far exceeding its humble beginnings. (Jager March 14, 1999) Earthquakes happen with little or no warning. Hurricanes ruin homes and break apart families and demolish cities. But the millennium, thats been basically predicted for ages. Unless, of course something looks wrong in this picture, and Y2K in nothing but a scam. Some people also voicing this opinion also agree that Y2K is a little exaggerated. Its really bizarre and its getting worse, I dont see any actual facts rolling around. Just†¦ mights, because we have never seen this situation before and assumptions are telling the story. (Zvegintzov September 7,1997) The world has never seen this problem before so we dont know if this bug could do any damage, and assumptions are telling the story and I have always said, that assumptions are the mother of all screw ups! Durable computers are being thrown away that work perfectly work but the government seems to think that its junk but has the bug so its useless. In my opinion this invited the thought of being a scam because if we throw out all the infected computers because of the assumption that the bug will destroy the system, than we just will have to go and buy another system and- for some families thats extremely costly. The problem that presents itself in this situation is that computer companies will make millions because some eggheads didnt think that changing to four digits would be a problem. Well, the bad news is that we did it deliberately, but with intentions, we assumed that the program we were using in 50s would not be used 40 years from now. That particular assumption was wrong, very wrong. (Noleman March 6. 1997) Personally to be truthful, I have grown to be somewhat skeptical that the year 2000 bug is not really anything of its magnitude. One of the factors that disturbs me the most are individuals who are technically capable of analyzing the problem and seem to have a vested interest in exaggerating its size and difficulty. Information systems managers will always welcome a few extra millions of dollars to convert aging systems and or enhance some of the more modern ones to accommodate the new threat of our electronic time period. Even for system analysts and programmers, the risks and rewards are one sided. If they play passive and agree that the problem is huge and it actually not they will still get the credit for fixing the equipment infected. But on the other hand if they say that it is not vary critical, and it turns out that a serious problem arises, they maybe in deep trouble. What is the downside of crying, wolf, if the year 2000 problems turn out to be easily manageable? Its intentionally lying to the world but for the government thats everyday life; covering up stories and making news thats what our world is. It is important that the media conveys bad stories more than good to make people think about if they were in the same situation but it also shows us things and twists the truth to change our opinions but thats another essay Im afraid. Of course none of this proves beyond a reasonable dought that the year 2000 problem has been over blown, but doesnt the burden of proof rest in the side of those who want to spend the billions of dollars to fix the problem. It is in the best interest of all countries to find out if it could well be a thought out scam; if not than the Y2K bug could be real like many people say, but my opinion will not change- that something smells wrong in the States.